Adapt.io vs Datanyze: Data Enrichment Tool Comparison

Adapt.io publishes its prices on a page anyone can read, and Datanyze's own site refused every fetch made for this comparison, its pricing and integrations pages included. That asymmetry shapes everything below. Datanyze integrations can only be described from what can be read, which is its Chrome Web Store listing, published by ZoomInfo Technologies. Adapt.io pricing can be read in full, down to the credits on each tier and what the yearly switch does to them.

Datanyze integrations: what can be confirmed

Datanyze's site answered HTTP 403 to a plain request and to a headless browser, integrations page included, so no integration list can be confirmed from Datanyze itself. What can be read is its Chrome Web Store listing: an extension, published by ZoomInfo Technologies, that pulls email addresses, direct dials and mobile numbers from LinkedIn profiles and company websites.

The listing says more about how the extension works than about what it connects to. It says that when you click to see all employees for a company on LinkedIn, Datanyze provides their contact information directly on the page, and it claims data on file for over 120 million contacts, including over 84 million email addresses and 48 million direct dial numbers. It offers a free trial. It names no CRM.

Earlier versions of this page listed Salesforce and HubSpot as Datanyze connections. No page readable today confirms either, and Salesloft's marketplace listing for Datanyze returned a browser challenge rather than a page, so ask Datanyze which CRM exports are live before relying on one. If the extension's shape does not fit, the field of Datanyze alternatives is wide.

The Quick Answer

Adapt.io is the one you can price today: its page lists a free plan, Starter at $49 a month for 500 email credits and Basic at $99 for 1,000 email credits plus 100 phone credits, with a Custom tier above. Datanyze is a ZoomInfo-published Chrome extension for looking people up on LinkedIn and company websites, with a free trial and no price that could be read. Choose Adapt.io to build lists at a known cost. Choose Datanyze to look people up one profile at a time, once Datanyze has told you what it costs.

Understanding the Core Difference

Adapt.io sells email, enrichment and phone credits by tier, with a daily contact ceiling on each. Its FAQ says its pricing is based on contact credits rather than user licences, and it has a Chrome extension of its own, which finds verified contact data on LinkedIn or a company website.

Datanyze is described by its Chrome Web Store listing as an extension that captures contact data from the places you prospect most, LinkedIn profiles and company websites, without leaving the browser.

So both put an extension on the same LinkedIn profile. The difference is what sits behind it: Adapt.io publishes a credit ladder and a list builder, and Datanyze's readable page describes the lookup and nothing else.

Pricing Comparison

Adapt.io pricing: what the page lists

The yearly column is what the page's own Monthly and Yearly switch shows: $490 a year for Starter with 6,000 email credits, and $990 for Basic with 12,000 email and 1,200 phone credits. The switch is labelled "Save 20%", but twelve months of Starter at $49 is $588 and of Basic at $99 is $1,188, so the yearly price works out about a sixth below paying monthly on both. Phone credits appear only at Basic, so a team that needs mobile numbers starts at the third rung. The page opens with a 7-day free trial that asks for no credit card, and its FAQ says the trial lets you purchase up to 50 contacts and explore every filter.

Source: Adapt.io Pricing

Datanyze Pricing

Datanyze's pricing page answered HTTP 403 to a plain request and to a headless browser alike when this comparison was refreshed, so this article states no Datanyze plan, price or credit allowance. The plan names and prices earlier versions of this page carried came from the pricing dataset behind this site rather than from a page read, and they have been removed rather than repeated. Its Chrome Web Store listing offers a free trial and shows no price.

Source: Datanyze Pricing

How these figures were checked

Adapt.io's tiers, credits, daily ceilings, yearly prices and trial terms were read from a dated copy of adapt.io/pricing, with the yearly prices taken from what the page displays after its own switch is clicked. Datanyze's figures were not checked because they could not be read, which is why none appear.

A figure belongs to a page rather than to a company, because vendors contradict themselves across their own surfaces, so the page is part of the fact. And a pricing page that renders a monthly and a yearly state into the same document will hand a careless reader a rate no visitor is shown, which is why the billing basis is named beside every number above.

What Adapt.io costs at a realistic volume

Take an invented case: one rep needing 160 contacts a month. The volume is illustrative and the rates are Adapt.io's published ones. Starter covers it at $49 a month with 500 email credits and a ceiling of 50 contacts a day, leaving 340 credits spare, which is about thirty one cents a contact at that volume; billed yearly, $490 buys 6,000 email credits for the year. Datanyze's side of the same arithmetic cannot be done from a readable page, so ask for its monthly allowance and price in writing and set them against Starter's 500.

Features Breakdown

Adapt.io's pricing page lists features by tier. Every plan carries the Chrome extension, advanced filters and list building; Starter adds CSV export, saved search and ABM list building; Basic adds phone numbers, CRM export and a limit on contacts per company; the Custom tier adds a suppression list, job change alerts, team management and API access. Its FAQ adds filters across over 3,000 industries and department-level employee growth.

Datanyze's readable surface is its extension listing, which describes emails, direct dials and mobile numbers from LinkedIn profiles and company websites, contact data on a company's all-employees view, data on file for over 120 million contacts, and a free trial. Both sides list a Chrome extension; what each one returns on your own prospects, and how often it is right, is the thing to test.

Adapt.io lists

• All plans Chrome extension, advanced filters, list building
• Starter CSV export, saved search, ABM list building
• Basic Phone numbers and CRM export
• Basic A limit on contacts per company
• Custom Suppression list, job change alerts, API access

Datanyze lists

• Emails, direct dials and mobiles from LinkedIn
• The same from company websites
• Contact data on a company's all-employees view
• Data on file for over 120 million contacts
• A free trial

Integration Ecosystem

Adapt.io's pricing page names its CRM export targets on the Basic plan: Salesforce, Hubspot, Pipedrive, Zoho, Outreach and Salesgear. Starter exports by CSV. Datanyze's readable listing names no CRM, as the integrations section above explains.

If your outbound runs through a sales engagement platform, that difference is a real constraint rather than a preference: Adapt.io documents an Outreach export on Basic, and no readable Datanyze page documents one at all.

Who Should Pick Which

Pick Adapt.io when the job is building lists and the cost has to be known before the quarter starts. Its tiers, credits and daily ceilings are all on the page, and Basic exports straight to a CRM or to Outreach.

Pick Datanyze when the work is one rep looking people up on LinkedIn and company websites, and the extension's free trial shows it covers your market. Get the price from Datanyze first, because none could be read.

Pick Adapt.io when outbound runs through Outreach or a CRM on its export list. Datanyze's readable listing documents neither.

Where Each One Sits in a Cold Outbound Stack

Adapt.io sits in the sourcing slot of a cold outbound stack, supplying the list a wave is built from. Datanyze, as its listing describes it, sits at the edge of it as a per-rep browser tool, better suited to looking up and qualifying one profile than to filling a campaign.

The limit shows up at the sending step. House practice is one message per campaign with no bumps and no thread replies, so a wave needs enough verified addresses to be worth running at all, and each address is checked separately from whoever supplied it before it is sent, because a bounce costs sending reputation. Deciding which of those you are building, a rep's lookup habit or a campaign's list, is the honest way to choose here, and it also decides whether b2b prospecting volume is your bottleneck.

Switching Between Them

Moving from Datanyze to Adapt.io is simple when Datanyze held individual lookups rather than workflow: take what you can export and rebuild the list in Adapt.io, where a daily contact ceiling of 50 on Starter and 100 on Basic sets the pace of the rebuild.

Going the other way is worth pressure testing first. Count your real monthly usage in Adapt.io, then ask Datanyze for its allowance in writing, because no Datanyze allowance could be read for this comparison. Adapt.io's FAQ says a cancelled subscription keeps working for the rest of the period already paid.

Feature Comparison Summary

Getting Started Checklist

1. Count contacts a month honestly, including the ones that fail to resolve
2. Check Adapt.io's daily contact ceiling (25, 50 or 100) against how you build lists
3. Ask Datanyze for its price, credit allowance and CRM exports in writing
4. Trial Datanyze's extension on the LinkedIn profiles you actually prospect
5. Confirm your CRM or sales engagement platform is on Adapt.io's export list
6. Verify every address before sending, whichever tool supplied it

Final Thoughts

Adapt.io is the one you can price and plan today: published tiers, a yearly switch that takes about a sixth off, and a CRM export list on Basic. Datanyze's own pages could not be read, so what it costs and what it connects to are questions for Datanyze, and its Chrome Web Store listing is the only readable description of what it does. Settle those in writing before comparing anything else.

Related Reading

• Best Adapt.io Alternatives in 2026
• Best Datanyze Alternatives in 2026
• Adapt.io vs Apollo.io: Data Enrichment Tool Comparison
• Adapt.io vs ZoomInfo: Data Enrichment Tool Comparison
• Apollo.io vs Datanyze: Data Enrichment Tool Comparison

If you would rather have this run for you, RevenueFlow books qualified meetings on a pay-per-meeting basis and publishes client results.

Pricing and features are taken from the vendors' own pages. Verify current terms with the vendor before relying on them.