Groove by Clari vs LeadIQ: Cross-Category Comparison
LeadIQ covers sourcing while Groove by Clari covers sending and follow-through. Which gap to close first, what a year costs, and whether a team needs both.

Close the data gap first when the list runs out. LeadIQ covers sourcing and verified contacts from $200 a month on the published rate card, while Groove by Clari covers sending and follow-through and names no price on its own page. Buy the sending side first only when meetings are already being booked and lost after the reply.
Key takeaways
- LeadIQ publishes a rate card rather than a ladder: an email costs 1 credit, a phone number 10, both together 11, and an account enrichment 3, on a slider from 200 to 6,750 a month.
- Groove is quoted inside the Clari platform rather than sold on its own, so its price depends on what else that contract carries.
- Half of this stack can be budgeted from public pages and half cannot, so treat any Groove figure in a plan as a placeholder until a quote lands.
- Data first, sending second, because a sending platform bought onto a thin list delivers the same thin list faster and hides the cause in its own reporting.
Reviewed and updated September 21, 2026
LeadIQ publishes the rate card most of this category withholds: an email costs 1 credit, a phone number 10, both together 11, and an account enrichment 3. A phone-heavy month therefore burns a LeadIQ allowance ten times faster than an email-only one, on the same $200 plan. Groove sits on the other side of that line and names no price on its own page, because it is sold as one product inside the Clari platform. Reading those two shapes together is what this comparison is for.
Why Compare These Two Tools?
Data enrichment tools provide the contact data that sales engagement platforms use for outreach sequences. The question for buyers is often whether an all-in-one platform that includes data can replace a dedicated enrichment tool.
Groove by Clari is a sales engagement platform focused on multi-channel sales outreach. Sales engagement and prospecting platform (part of Clari, which merged with Salesloft in December 2025) that automates email sequences, logging, and analytics, and integrates with Salesforce to keep activity data in the CRM.
LeadIQ is a data enrichment tool focused on B2B lead data and contact enrichment. LeadIQ is a B2B prospecting platform with AI-powered email personalization (Scribe), champion tracking, and one-click CRM capture.
That framing is right and it stops short of the decision, which is whether a team needs both at once or one of them first.
Where Each Tool Fits in Your Workflow
- Step 1Lead sourcing and data
LeadIQ covers B2B lead data and contact enrichment, on a free entry plan.
- Step 2Outreach orchestration
Groove by Clari covers multi-channel sales outreach.
| Aspect | Groove by Clari | LeadIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sales Engagement Platform | Data Enrichment Tool |
| Workflow Stage | Outreach orchestration | Lead sourcing and data |
| Primary Focus | Multi-channel sales outreach | B2B lead data and contact enrichment |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Free |
| Features Listed | 10 | 10 |
| Integrations | 9 | 8 |
What Each Side Actually Does in a Cold Outbound Run
A cold outbound run has a fixed shape, and these two categories sit in different parts of it. Targeting comes first, and that is a decision about who is worth writing to rather than a piece of software. Then the list gets built and a mailbox gets resolved for every person on it. That half belongs to LeadIQ: search filters, an extension over a profile, a spreadsheet pushed back through enrichment, and a verification pass that discards anything the provider could not confirm.
Sending is Groove by Clari's half. Sender accounts, sending windows, the daily cap on each mailbox, reply detection and the record of who answered all live there. RevenueFlow runs one message per campaign, so nothing on that side is a bump step or a thread reply waiting to fire. A prospect who stays quiet gets re-approached later through a new campaign with a different angle, never with a second message stacked under the one they ignored, and on LinkedIn that second message does not get sent at all.
The last stage belongs to neither product. Somebody reads the reply and somebody books the meeting, and the meeting counts only against qualification criteria written down before launch.
Pricing Comparison

Groove by Clari Pricing
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Groove | Contact Sales |
Groove is sold as one product inside the Clari platform rather than on its own ladder, and Clari's pricing page ends at a Get a quote form.
Groove's product and pricing pages on clari.com now redirect to Salesloft. Clari and Salesloft completed their merger on December 3, 2025, and Salesloft's merger page says the two "are now operating as one company, with Salesloft as our go-forward company and platform brand." Salesloft's site still offers a Groove login, and the merged company's customer FAQ says it has no current plans for required migrations from one product to the other. The Groove details above describe the product as Clari listed it, so confirm current packaging and price with Salesloft.
Sources: Clari and Salesloft complete merger, Salesloft and Clari are now one company, merger customer FAQ
LeadIQ Pricing
| Plan | Price | Contacts | Emails |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 1 user, 50 credits | N/A |
| Pro | $200/mo | From 200 credits/month, up to 5 users | N/A |
| Enterprise | Contact Sales | Custom | N/A |
Pro is credit metered on a slider the page renders from 200 up to 6,750 credits a month, with annual billing marked 25% off. The rate card underneath prices an email at 1 credit, a phone number at 10, both together at 11, and an account enrichment at 3, which makes the mix rather than the volume the number that moves a LeadIQ bill.
Source: LeadIQ Pricing
Reading the Two Price Shapes Together
LeadIQ publishes a rate card rather than a ladder, and it is the most readable metering on this shelf. LeadIQ Pro is $200 a month, metered on a credit slider the page renders from 200 up to 6,750 credits a month, with annual billing marked 25% off. The rate card underneath is what makes the number usable: an email costs 1 credit, a phone number 10, both together 11, and an account enrichment 3. So the real question on LeadIQ is the mix rather than the volume, because a phone-heavy month burns credits ten times faster than an email-only one. The free tier is 1 user and 50 credits.
Groove names no price and no package ladder on its own page. It is sold as one product inside the Clari platform, Clari's pricing page ends at a Get a quote form, and the only public commercial detail there is Clari's statement that the platform is an out-of-the-box solution with no extra platform fees for integrations or continuous support. The buying question is rarely Groove on its own; it is what the Clari contract covers, since the same agreement carries forecasting and revenue capture a team may not want yet.
Those are two different kinds of number and they do not compare directly. LeadIQ publishes a rate a team can multiply out before speaking to anybody; Groove by Clari publishes a shape and produces the rate on a call. Half of this stack can be budgeted today and half cannot, so a plan treating the Groove line as an estimate is guessing at the larger of the two numbers.
What One Year of This Stack Actually Costs
Take an invented but ordinary case: one seat working 150 new contacts a month and wanting a phone number for a third of them. The rate card below is LeadIQ's own; the seat and the mix are invented to make the arithmetic concrete.
At LeadIQ's published rates that month costs 100 emails at 1 credit each plus 50 email-and-phone reveals at 11, which is 650 credits. LeadIQ Pro is $200 a month, or $2,400 a year paying monthly, and the page marks annual billing 25% off. Drop the phone numbers entirely and the same 150 contacts cost 150 credits, so the phone decision is worth more than four times the data decision on that shelf.
Read the slider before the tier: it runs from 200 to 6,750 credits a month, so the honest question on LeadIQ is how many phone numbers a wave needs rather than how many contacts it touches.
The Groove side of that year cannot be added, which is the finding rather than a gap in the research. Groove is quoted as part of the Clari platform, so the figure in a plan for it depends on what else in that platform the contract carries.
Feature Highlights
Groove by Clari Key Capabilities (Sales Engagement Platform)
- Multi-channel engagement flows
- Auto-logging of all activities to Salesforce
- Email tracking with open and click analytics
- Dialer with call logging and recording
- Meeting scheduler with calendar integration
- Analytics dashboards for sequence performance
- Template and snippet management
- Revenue intelligence (via Clari platform)
- Account-based engagement workflows
LeadIQ Key Capabilities (Data Enrichment Tool)
- Scribe AI email personalization
- Champion tracking for job changes
- One-click CRM capture
- Verified work emails and mobile numbers
- Account and contact discovery
- LinkedIn Sales Navigator integration
- AI-powered account prioritization
- Salesforce and HubSpot data sync
- Sequence integration (Outreach, SalesLoft)
- 30-day free trial
Where the Two Actually Overlap
LeadIQ stops just short of sending, deliberately. It lists Scribe for AI email personalisation and one-click capture into a sequence, so it writes the message and hands it to a platform that sends it rather than sending anything itself. Groove lists no database. Its defining claim is where the activity data lands rather than a feature count: Clari's own Groove page sells it as capturing every sales activity into Salesforce as a single source of truth.
Both lists are the vendors' own wording, so the honest reading is that LeadIQ lists these capabilities and Groove by Clari lists those. A feature named on a plan card is a claim about scope rather than a measure of quality, and the overlap that matters in practice sits at Salesforce, Gmail and LinkedIn Sales Navigator.
Integration Ecosystem
Groove by Clari Integrations
Groove by Clari connects with: Salesforce, Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft 365, Google Calendar, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Clari, Zoom, Slack.
LeadIQ Integrations
LeadIQ connects with: Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, SalesLoft, Gong, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Gmail, Zapier.
Shared Integrations
Both tools integrate with: Salesforce, Gmail, LinkedIn Sales Navigator. This shared ecosystem means they can work together in your tech stack.
When to Choose Which

- Your biggest gap is in outreach orchestration
- You already have a solid data enrichment tool and need specialized multi-channel sales outreach capabilities
- You need enterprise-grade multi-channel sales outreach features
- Your team's primary bottleneck is multi-channel sales outreach
- Your biggest gap is in lead sourcing and data
- You already have a sales engagement platform and need better B2B lead data and contact enrichment
- You want an affordable entry point ($0/mo)
- Your team's primary bottleneck is B2B lead data and contact enrichment
Read that split as a question about which gap is open rather than about which product is better. A team that names the wrong gap buys a capable tool that changes nothing.
Do You Need Both, and in Which Order?
These two genuinely do different jobs, so the question is order rather than either. LeadIQ decides who receives the message and Groove by Clari decides how the team works once messages are going out, and a team with neither has a list problem before it has a workflow problem.
The order that works is data first, sending second, for reasons of measurement rather than preference. A sending platform bought onto a thin list delivers that list faster and its reporting will blame the quiet quarter on copy.
One case honestly reverses it. A team already booking meetings and losing them to disorganised follow-through has a workflow gap rather than a data gap. Groove is a reasonable answer there, particularly for a team whose reporting already lives in Salesforce, because auto-logging removes the step reps skip.
Whichever way round, the two connect through Salesforce, Gmail and LinkedIn Sales Navigator, and that is the surface to test during a trial rather than after one. A handoff needing a CSV in the middle is one somebody stops doing in week three.
Using Both Together

Many sales teams use both a sales engagement platform and a data enrichment tool as part of their complete workflow. Groove by Clari handles outreach orchestration while LeadIQ covers lead sourcing and data.
Since both tools integrate with Salesforce, Gmail, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, connecting them in your workflow is straightforward.
Rolling It Out Without Breaking the Run
Start with LeadIQ's free tier, 1 user and 50 credits, and spend those credits deliberately on the mix a real wave would need rather than on emails alone. The rate card makes that test predictive: 50 credits is 50 emails or roughly four email-and-phone reveals, and knowing which of those a campaign depends on is the whole tier decision. Groove lands second, and its rollout is a Salesforce project as much as a sales one. Being centred on the CRM is the reason to buy it and also the reason the implementation touches objects, permissions and reporting that outbound does not normally touch.
Whichever order the two arrive in, keep the sending inventory out of it. Sender domains, mailbox warmup and daily caps are their own project, and a stack change made in the same week as a sending change leaves nothing to attribute a bounce rate to. Change one layer, let a full wave run, then change the next.
One habit saves real money: trial on accounts already worked rather than on a fresh list, because the only coverage question that matters is coverage on the segment being sold to.
Decision Framework
- Name the gap before naming a tool. Write down which stage is costing meetings: a list that runs out, addresses that bounce, or messages that never go out on time. A decision made without that sentence is a preference.
- Check what the existing stack already covers. Overlapping spend is the normal failure here, and it is invisible because the two products sit under different budget lines.
- Price the whole year, not the entry tier. Seat minimums, billing basis and per-credit top-ups move the real number more than the headline does.
- Trial on the accounts being sold to. Coverage is a property of a segment rather than of a database.
- Measure at the pipeline, not per tool. Both products feed one funnel, so the honest measure is meetings booked against criteria fixed in advance.
The Short Version
- LeadIQ can be priced from its own page today, starting at $200 a month on the terms in the table above.
- Groove by Clari names no price on its own pricing page, so the Groove line in any budget is a quote until a call happens.
- Neither product replaces the other, so the choice is which gap gets closed first rather than which vendor wins.
- Buy the data side first when the list runs out, and the sending side first when meetings are being booked and then lost after the reply.
- Measure the change in meetings booked against criteria fixed before launch, because that is the only number both products are trying to move.
Related Reading
- Best Groove by Clari Alternatives in 2026
- Best LeadIQ Alternatives in 2026
- Groove by Clari vs Outreach: Sales Engagement Platform Comparison
- Groove by Clari vs Salesloft: Sales Engagement Platform Comparison
- Apollo.io vs LeadIQ: Data Enrichment Tool Comparison
If you would rather have this run for you, RevenueFlow books qualified meetings on a pay-per-meeting basis and publishes client results.
Pricing and features are taken from the vendors' own pages. Verify current terms with the vendor before relying on them.
Frequently asked questions.
Frequently asked questions- Do I need both LeadIQ and Groove, or will one do?
- Most teams start with one. LeadIQ answers a sourcing question and Groove by Clari answers a sending and follow-through question, so the honest test is which one is currently costing meetings. A list that runs out mid-wave is a data problem. Meetings booked and then lost to disorganised follow-up is a workflow problem, and only that second case justifies buying sending first.
- How much does LeadIQ actually cost for a year?
- LeadIQ publishes Pro at $200 a month with annual billing marked 25% off, so the yearly number is arithmetic rather than a guess. Multiply the published rate by twelve and by the seats or the volume the plan is metered on, then check the billing basis, because the monthly and annual figures on that page describe the same plan and differ by a meaningful amount.
- Why does Groove not publish a price?
- Groove is quoted inside the Clari platform rather than sold on its own, so its price depends on what else that contract carries. Enterprise sales engagement is sold on seats, usage and contract length together, so a public rate would be wrong for most buyers. The practical consequence for a budget is that this line is a quote, and the way to make two quotes comparable is to give each vendor the same seat count and the same volume assumption.
- What happens to the prospects who never reply?
- RevenueFlow runs one message per campaign and sends no bumps or thread replies, whichever of these products is doing the sending. A prospect who stays quiet is re-approached later in a new campaign with a different angle, and on LinkedIn that second message is not sent at all, because it lands under the one they already ignored.
About the author.
Tim Carden is CMO / CTO at RevenueFlow, which builds and operates outbound revenue engines for B2B companies. Studied at McGill University.
Tim Carden · CMO / CTO
Connect on LinkedIn →Explore more.
Ready to scale your outreach?
We build GTM engines that book real meetings. See the receipts.
Related articles.
Groove by Clari vs mailfloss: Sales Engagement Platform vs Data Enrichment Tool Comparison
Compare Groove by Clari (sales engagement platform) and mailfloss (data enrichment tool) side by side. See pricing, features, and integrations to decide which one, or both, your stack needs.
AroundDeal vs Leadspicker: Data Enrichment Tool vs Sales Engagement Platform Comparison
Compare AroundDeal (data enrichment tool) and Leadspicker (sales engagement platform) side by side. See pricing, features, and integrations to decide which one, or both, your stack needs.
Gong vs NeverBounce: Sales Engagement Platform vs Data Enrichment Tool Comparison
Gong vs NeverBounce: what Gong's own pages say about enrichment, what NeverBounce's API returns about an address, and how each vendor prices.
ContactOut vs Luru: Data Enrichment Tool vs Sales Engagement Platform Comparison
Compare ContactOut (data enrichment tool) and Luru (sales engagement platform) side by side. See pricing, features, and integrations to decide which one, or both, your stack needs.
Enrich Layer vs La Growth Machine: Data Enrichment Tool vs Sales Engagement Platform Comparison
Compare Enrich Layer (data enrichment tool) and La Growth Machine (sales engagement platform) side by side. See pricing, features, and integrations to decide which one, or both, your stack needs.
Leadspicker vs NeverBounce: Sales Engagement Platform vs Data Enrichment Tool Comparison
Compare Leadspicker (sales engagement platform) and NeverBounce (data enrichment tool) side by side. See pricing, features, and integrations to decide which one, or both, your stack needs.