PersistIQ Pricing: A Demo Form Where the Ladder Was

PersistIQ does not publish a price for its platform on any page fetched on 4 September 2026. As published on PersistIQ's pricing page on 2026-09-04, the page at the pricing address is a demo request form titled Customer Results, with no plan, no figure and no currency on it. The apex page, the page at the same address without a trailing slash, and two rendered reads in a browser all served the same form. That is the state of the vendor's platform pricing today, and it is a fact worth stating plainly because several third-party pages quote a per-seat rate for it.

What the vendor does publish is a ladder for Luka, its email prospecting add-on, at two billing states. This article records the absence for the platform, the Luka ladder in full, and the trial terms, which is everything the vendor's site says about money.

The platform: a demo form where the price would be

1. Step 1The pricing address

   A demo request form titled Customer Results. No plan, no price, no currency.

2. Step 2The apex

   The same product page, with a free trial button and no price.

3. Step 3The Luka pricing page

   A three-plan ladder for the email prospecting add-on, billed yearly, with a link to a monthly copy.

4. Step 4The link back

   Both Luka pages link to the platform pricing address for PersistIQ pricing, which serves the form.

The demo form has a short list of fields and a heading about customer results. The same route answered one scripted fetch with a forbidden error earlier on 4 September 2026 and answered normally within the hour, so the page's behaviour toward automated readers varies; but on every read that returned the page, the page was the form. A buyer who wants the platform price talks to the vendor.

Third-party listings quote $59 per user a month for an Essentials plan and $99 for Premium, billed yearly. No vendor page fetched on 4 September 2026 prints those figures. They may be what the sales team quotes, or what the page said at an earlier date. They are not vendor facts today, and they are not treated as such here.

Luka: the ladder the vendor does publish

Luka is the vendor's email prospecting product, a finder for business email addresses with a monthly credit allowance. Its pricing page loads on yearly billing and links to a monthly copy at a separate address.

FreeNo card

• Ten email credits a month
• Find a hundred business emails
• Unlimited contact import

BulkPer user

• Two thousand email credits a month
• Find two thousand business emails
• CSV export

PlusPer user

• Five thousand email credits a month
• Find five thousand business emails
• CSV export and a higher daily send limit

Billed yearly. On the page, Free $0, Bulk $25 per user a month, Plus $40 per user a month.

Billed monthly. On the page, Free $0, Bulk $35 per user a month, Plus $50 per user a month.

The yearly saving is $10 a month on either paid plan, which is 29% on Bulk and 20% on Plus. Bulk carries 2,000 email credits a month and Plus 5,000, with one credit per business email found. The free plan carries ten credits and is a trial in the shape of a plan.

The Luka FAQ states a 14-day free trial on the yearly plans, unlimited contact import, and a daily send limit that varies by plan. The daily send limit is the one figure the page names without giving, so a team that intends to send from Luka rather than just find addresses should ask for it.

What Luka is and is not

Luka is an email finder with sending attached, priced per user on a credit meter. It is not the PersistIQ sales engagement platform, and buying it does not buy the platform. The two pages link to each other, and the Luka page's link for PersistIQ pricing goes to the demo form. A buyer who arrives at Luka's ladder looking for the platform price has found the wrong product's price.

As an email finder, Luka's $25 per user a month yearly for 2,000 credits is 1.25 cents per email found at full use, which is at the low end against the standalone email finder and verification tools a sales team may already pay for. That comparison is the right one for Luka; the platform has no comparison because it has no price.

What the apex says

The product page positions PersistIQ for small sales teams and states a 14-day free trial and native sync with Copper and Salesforce. The trial is the only commercial term on the platform side of the site. A team can therefore try the platform without knowing what it costs, and learn the price in the sales conversation the trial leads to.

The vendor's customer stories page names sales development teams and account executives at small companies as the buyer.

Pricing a team, as far as the site allows

For the platform: not possible from the site. Three users cost three times a number the vendor will tell you.

For Luka: three users on Bulk, yearly, is $75 a month, $900 a year, for 6,000 email credits a month across the team. Three on Plus is $120 a month, $1,440 a year, for 15,000 credits. Monthly, the same three are $105 or $150 a month.

The trial without a price

The platform trial deserves a word because it is the vendor's actual commercial offer to a new buyer. Fourteen days of the product, with the sync to Copper and Salesforce that the apex advertises, and then a conversation in which the price appears. That sequence puts the buyer in the position of having done the setup work before knowing the number, which is not a trap, but it is the order the vendor has chosen. A team evaluating this against a published-price rival should get the quote before the trial starts, not after, and the demo form at the pricing address is where that request goes.

The trial is also the only place the vendor's own site describes what the platform includes in commercial terms. The customer stories page says who buys it; the apex says how long the trial is. Neither says what a seat carries. That is a second thing to ask for in writing alongside the price.

The Luka monthly page

The monthly Luka ladder lives at a separate address from the yearly one rather than behind a toggle, and the yearly page links to it. That structure means a scripted read of the main Luka page sees only the yearly figures, and a buyer who does not follow the link sees $25 and $40 without the monthly $35 and $50 beside them. Both pages carry the same plan names and credit counts; only the rate and the billing line differ. A team unsure about committing to a year of an email finder should read the monthly page and compare the $10 a month gap against the value of leaving.

The credit counts on both pages are per user per month, so a team of three on Bulk has 6,000 credits across the team rather than 2,000 shared, and the page does not describe pooling between users.

Why an unpublished price is the finding

A vendor that removes its ladder and replaces it with a form has made a commercial decision, and the decision is information. It usually means the price is negotiated per account, that it has moved up, or that the vendor is steering buyers to a conversation where the add-ons can be introduced. None of those is a reason not to buy, but each is a reason not to trust a figure from a page that is not the vendor's. The sales engagement platform survey sets out which vendors in this category publish and which quote, and PersistIQ has moved to the quoting side while its add-on stays on the publishing side.

The vendor's nearest alternatives mostly publish per-seat ladders, which makes the comparison one-sided: their prices are known and this one is not. A buyer in a comparison should get the PersistIQ quote in writing, with the billing period and the seat count, before setting it beside a published rate. The seat ladders for the cold email senders in that set are in the cold email pricing guide.

Whatever the platform costs, the sending rules do not change with the price. One message per campaign, sent once, and no second campaign to the people who did not reply with the same offer. A negotiated seat price is not a reason to send more from it.

Before you buy PersistIQ

• ✓Yes: That the platform price is a quote, since the pricing page is a demo form
• ✓Yes: The quote in writing with the billing period and seat count
• ✓Yes: Whether you are pricing Luka or the platform, since only Luka is published
• ✓Yes: Which Luka billing state you read, yearly on the main page and monthly on its copy
• ~Depends: The Luka daily send limit, which the FAQ names but does not give
• ~Depends: Whether the trial covers the platform features you need before the price is known

The short version

As published on PersistIQ's site on 4 September 2026: no platform price by any route, with the pricing address serving a demo form; Luka at $0, $25 and $40 per user a month billed yearly or $0, $35 and $50 monthly, with 10, 2,000 and 5,000 email credits; a 14-day trial on both products; third-party per-seat figures for the platform that no vendor page carries today.

If a vendor conversation is not how you want to learn what outbound costs, we run outbound as a campaign engagement with the price stated up front, and you can see what one would look like for your market.

Every statement above is as published on PersistIQ's site on 2026-09-04: the platform pricing address and apex read plain and in a browser, the Luka pricing page and its monthly copy, and the FAQ on each. The absence of a platform price is a statement about those pages on that day. Prices change; check the page before you buy.

Sources: PersistIQ pricing address, Luka pricing page, Luka monthly pricing