Dripify: The LinkedIn Tool That Publishes Its Daily Quotas
Dripify publishes a per-plan table of daily action quotas, which almost nobody else does. What those numbers are, and what they are not.
Dripify is a cloud LinkedIn sequencer publishing per-plan daily action quotas on its own pricing page, from 20 connection requests a day on Basic to 75 on higher tiers. Prices are per user: $59, $79 and $99 monthly, or $39, $59 and $79 on annual billing.
Key takeaways
- The vendor's own pricing FAQ states both billing states: $39, $59 and $79 per user annually, and $59, $79 and $99 per user monthly.
- Published daily quotas run from 20 connection requests, 30 messages, 10 InMails and 100 profile views on Basic to 75, 100 or more, 30 and 200 or more above it.
- Those quotas are the vendor's software limits. LinkedIn publishes no corresponding numeric daily or weekly ceiling on its own help pages.
- Every paid tier includes 100 email finder credits a month, with additional packs published at $29 for 1,000 up to $99 for 10,000.
Reviewed and updated August 16, 2026
Dripify publishes something almost nobody else in LinkedIn automation does: a table of its own per-plan daily action quotas. On its pricing page, the Basic plan is capped at 20 connection requests a day, 30 messages, 10 Sales Navigator InMails and 100 profile views. Pro and Advanced raise those to 75, 100 or more, 30 and 200 or more. Fetched 16 August 2026.
That table is the most useful thing the vendor ships, and it is worth understanding exactly what it is before leaning on it. Those are Dripify's product limits, not LinkedIn's. LinkedIn publishes almost no numeric activity ceilings of its own, so a vendor quota is a statement about what the software will let you do, and it carries no promise about what the platform will tolerate.
What Dripify is
Dripify is a cloud LinkedIn sequencer. Campaigns run on vendor infrastructure rather than inside your browser, so a laptop closing at six o'clock does not stop a sequence mid-flight. You build a drip of connection requests, messages, endorsements, profile views and follows with conditions between the steps, and replies land in a shared inbox.
The cloud architecture is the defining choice, and it cuts both ways. Campaigns keep running without your machine, and LinkedIn sees the account signing in from an address that is not the one associated with that member historically. Every cloud vendor in this category answers that with a dedicated IP per account, and the quality of that answer is the thing worth asking about rather than the sequence builder.
Its published feature list includes LinkedIn and email sequences in one campaign, an email finder metered in credits, CRM integrations, CSV export, webhooks, A/B testing and multi-team management on the top tier.
What it costs
The pricing page carries a monthly and an annual state in one document, and it resolves the ambiguity itself in its own FAQ, which is unusually clean for this category.
- One drip campaign
- Limited daily quotas
- LinkedIn and email sequences
- 100 email finder credits included
- Advanced analytics and reports
- Sequence templates
- 24/7 live support
- Unlimited drip campaigns
- Full daily quotas
- Everything in Basic
- Dedicated inbox
- CSV export
- Webhook integration
- HubSpot integration
- Everything in Pro
- Multi-team management
- Lead tagging and step analytics
- Evergreen leads and A/B testing
- Enterprise adds premium onboarding
- Enterprise adds a dedicated CSM
- Enterprise publishes no figure
Email finder credits sit outside the plan price. The page publishes 100 credits included on every paid tier, then 1,000 credits for $29, 2,000 for $49, 5,000 for $69 and 10,000 for $99. Anyone planning to run LinkedIn and email as one motion should price that line separately, because 100 credits is a rounding error against a real list.
Pricing is per user, which is the structure that decides the bill at any real team size. By our own arithmetic on those published rates, a three-seat Pro setup on monthly billing is $237 a month before a single email credit is bought.
The quota table, read properly
Here is the thing the published quotas actually tell you.
Basic against Pro and Advanced
Basic against the higher tiers
Basic against the higher tiers
Basic against the higher tiers
The gap between the tiers is the commercially interesting part. Upgrading from Basic to Pro does not buy a better sequencer, it buys permission to send roughly three and a half times as many connection requests a day from one account. The product is metering throughput, and the price is attached to throughput.
Whether you should use that permission is a separate question, and it is not one the vendor answers. LinkedIn's help page on invitation restrictions is explicit that an account may be restricted when it has "sent many invitations within a short amount of time", when many invitations are "ignored, left pending, or marked as spam", and states directly that "if you send an excessive number of invitations and we suspect the use of an automation tool, we may suspend or restrict your account". No figure is attached to any of those.
So the honest reading is that 75 connection requests a day per account is a number Dripify will permit, and there is no published platform figure to check it against. That is a number to test carefully on an account you can afford to lose, not a target.
What the vendor claims about safety
Dripify's own page lists "built-in LinkedIn protection" on Basic and "advanced LinkedIn protection" on Advanced, alongside "cloud-based performance", "access from unique, local IP-address", "human behavior simulation", "lead duplication security" and "activity control".
Those are the vendor's claims about its own product, and they are worth reading as product descriptions rather than as safety guarantees. Human behaviour simulation describes how a tool paces and randomises its actions. It is not a statement from LinkedIn about what LinkedIn detects, and no third-party vendor is in a position to make one.
The position that does come from the platform is unambiguous. LinkedIn's User Agreement, effective 3 November 2025, prohibits members from using "software, devices, scripts, robots or any other means or processes (such as crawlers, browser plugins and add-ons or any other technology) to scrape or copy the Services", and separately from using bots "or other unauthorized automated methods to access the Services, add or download contacts, send or redirect messages". Its help page on prohibited software and extensions states that members using such tools "risk having their accounts restricted or shut down" and that the tools themselves may stop working without notice.
Every vendor in this category operates against that text. A tool is not approved because its marketing says it mimics human behaviour, and the useful question is not which tool is permitted but how much of your pipeline sits behind a single account when a restriction lands.
Where Dripify fits, and where it does not
Dripify suits a small team running LinkedIn as a primary channel from a handful of seats, wanting sequences that keep running without a machine on, and willing to pay per user.
It fits badly in two situations. The first is agency work across many client accounts, because per-seat pricing multiplies directly with sender count and the multi-account tooling is a top-tier feature rather than the product's centre of gravity. The multi-sender model that suits that shape is described in our HeyReach review, which is the tool we run client LinkedIn outreach through.
The second is scraping and data extraction. Dripify sequences and finds emails; it is not a scraping platform, and treating it as one puts profile-extraction volume through an account you also send from. Those are detected differently and separating them is basic hygiene.
The Dripify review, in one section
Reviews of Dripify converge on the same two findings, and both are visible from the vendor's own surfaces without needing anyone's testing claims.
What it does well is the thing it charges for. The sequence builder is genuinely simple, the cloud execution removes the single largest operational annoyance of browser-based tools, and the published quota table means you know what the software will permit before you pay. Very few vendors in this category tell you that up front.
What it does badly is scale economically. Per-seat pricing on a channel whose safe operating model is many accounts at low volume is a structural mismatch. The cheapest way to send safely is more senders each doing less, and the cheapest way to buy Dripify is fewer seats each doing more. Those two pressures point in opposite directions, and the second one wins on the invoice.
The recurring complaints in public review corpora concern the sequence editor rather than the sending: campaigns that resist edits once running, and flowcharts that print poorly. Those are workflow irritations rather than deliverability problems, and they are worth weighing against the fact that the same corpora rate the support highly.
The verdict that follows from the published facts is narrow and specific. Dripify is a reasonable buy for one to three seats running LinkedIn plus email as a primary channel, where the per-seat rate is still small against a salary. It is a poor buy above that, and it is the wrong product entirely for agency work across many client accounts or for scraping at volume.
What to settle before buying
Establish what happens to a plan's quota when LinkedIn restricts the account, since the software limit and the platform's tolerance are independent and only one of them is published. Establish whether email finder credits roll over, because the included 100 will not survive a first campaign. Establish how the dedicated IP is assigned and whether it is stable for the life of the account, because IP consistency is the property the whole cloud architecture rests on. Ask specifically whether the address is dedicated or shared, whether it is matched to the account's stated country, and what happens to it if you pause the subscription for a month and come back.
And decide the channel shape before the tool. A LinkedIn-only motion inherits every platform risk above with nothing behind it, which is why we pair it with email rather than running it alone. The wider comparison of what is safe in this category sits in LinkedIn automation tools, the pricing detail in Dripify pricing, and the alternatives worth weighing in Dripify alternatives.
If you would rather not own the account risk at all, get a free campaign plan and we will map the channel to your ICP before anything sends.
Pricing and features verified as of August 2026. Verify current terms with the vendor before relying on them.
Frequently asked questions.
Frequently asked questions- How much does Dripify cost?
- Its pricing page FAQ states the figures directly: $39 per user a month on Basic, $59 on Pro and $79 on Advanced when billed annually, and $59, $79 and $99 respectively on monthly billing. Enterprise is quote-only. Email finder credits beyond the included 100 are priced separately from $29 for 1,000.
- What are Dripify daily limits?
- Its pricing page publishes 20 connection requests, 30 messages, 10 Sales Navigator InMails and 100 profile views a day on Basic, rising to 75, 100 or more, 30 and 200 or more on Pro and Advanced. Those are the vendor's own software caps rather than any figure published by LinkedIn.
- Does a published quota mean it is safe to send that much?
- No. LinkedIn does not publish numeric activity ceilings, so there is nothing to check a vendor quota against. Its help page describes triggers qualitatively and states that suspected use of an automation tool can itself lead to suspension. Treat a quota as what the software permits, not as what the platform tolerates.
- Is Dripify worth it for an agency?
- Generally not, because per-seat pricing multiplies with account count while the safe operating model wants more accounts each doing less. Those pressures point in opposite directions and the invoice is where they meet. Multi-sender platforms priced around sender count rather than software seats fit agency work better.
About the author.
B2B cold email experts helping companies generate qualified leads through done-for-you outreach campaigns.
RevenueFlow Team
Explore more.
Ready to scale your outreach?
We build GTM engines that book real meetings. See the receipts.
Related articles.
Dripify Alternatives: The Per-Seat Problem and What Fixes It
Most people leaving Dripify are unhappy with the arithmetic rather than the software. That diagnosis decides which alternatives are actually alternatives.
Zopto Now Redirects to Zeekeo: What the 301 Means for Buyers
zopto.com returns an HTTP 301 to Zeekeo and serves a page that never says Zopto. The redirect chain, what the destination publishes, and what to re-price.
Expandi: The Bypass Feature and What LinkedIn's Terms Say
Expandi's pricing page advertises campaign types that allow bypassing outreach limits. LinkedIn's User Agreement names bypassing use limits as prohibited.
Dripify Pricing: What Per-User Billing Costs at Real Account Counts
Dripify answers its own pricing question in a FAQ, which saves the usual archaeology over a billing toggle. The unit is where the real cost hides.
Expandi Pricing: One Published Tier and What Scales It
Expandi publishes one self-serve price, $99 a month per seat. The question is what happens to that figure once accounts, add-ons and ramping are counted.
Linked Helper: The Desktop Architecture Nobody Describes Right
Most write-ups file Linked Helper under browser extensions. It is a desktop application with its own embedded browser, and its pricing reflects that.