Waalaxy: Priced by Invitation Allowance, and What That Hides
Waalaxy prints the monthly invitation allowance on each plan card, which makes it easy to evaluate and easy to misread as a platform limit.
Waalaxy is a hybrid LinkedIn tool combining a browser extension with a cloud layer for sequencing and campaign management. Its pricing page served EUR 19, 49 and 69 per user a month to our fetch, with published monthly invitation allowances of 300 on the entry tier and 800 above it.
Key takeaways
- Rates served to our fetch on 16 August 2026 were EUR 19, 49 and 69 per user a month, with quarterly at minus 20 percent and yearly at minus 50 percent.
- Published invitation allowances are 300 a month on Pro and 800 on both Advanced and Business, so the top upgrade adds email rather than volume.
- An 800 monthly allowance is roughly 185 a week from one account, which is a product allowance rather than any figure LinkedIn publishes.
- LinkedIn publishes no numeric weekly invitation ceiling, only qualitative triggers including velocity and invitations ignored, left pending or marked as spam.
Reviewed and updated August 16, 2026
Waalaxy prices its plans by how many LinkedIn invitations they let you send per month, and prints the number on the plan card: 300 on Pro, 800 on Advanced, 800 on Business. That is unusually direct, and it makes the product easy to evaluate, because the thing being sold is stated rather than implied.
The prices served to a fetch from our infrastructure on 16 August 2026 were in euros: €19, €49 and €69 per user per month. Waalaxy is a French company and euros are plausibly its native currency, but pricing pages in this category do localise, so treat the currency as the one this page served rather than as the one you will be quoted.
What Waalaxy is
Waalaxy is a hybrid. A browser extension handles the LinkedIn actions inside your session, with a cloud layer for syncing, sequencing and campaign management. It sits between the pure extension tools and the fully cloud-hosted platforms, and it targets solo sellers and small teams rather than agencies.
Its published feature set covers unlimited campaigns, pre-built prospecting sequences, automated LinkedIn follow-ups, CRM synchronisation across a large integration surface, CSV import and export, and team collaboration tools. The Business tier adds cold email sequences, multichannel campaigns combining LinkedIn and email, and 500 email finder credits.
What it costs
- Positioned for launching first campaigns
- Unlimited campaigns
- Pre-built prospecting sequences
- Automated LinkedIn follow-ups
- CRM synchronisation
- Team collaboration tools
- 14-day free trial
- Everything in Pro
- Described on the page as maximum LinkedIn invitation limits
- API access
- Make, Zapier and N8N modules
- Live chat support
- Marked as most popular
- Everything in Advanced
- Cold email sequences
- Multichannel campaigns across LinkedIn and email
- 500 email finder credits
- Same 800 invite allowance as Advanced
Read the invite column and the price column together and the structure becomes obvious. By our own arithmetic on the published rates, Pro to Advanced costs €30 a month more and buys 500 additional invitations plus API access, while Advanced to Business costs €20 more and buys no additional invitations at all, only the email channel. So the second upgrade is a channel decision and the first is a volume decision, and they should be made for different reasons.
The number to be careful with
800 invitations a month is roughly 185 a week from a single account. That figure deserves scrutiny, not because the vendor is doing anything wrong by publishing it, but because of what it is and is not.
It is a product allowance. It states how many invitations Waalaxy's software will send for you inside a billing period. It is not a statement about what LinkedIn permits, because LinkedIn does not publish a weekly invitation ceiling on its own help pages at all.
The figure widely reported across this industry since the 2021 tightening is substantially lower than 185 a week, and it circulates as though it were published. It is not. LinkedIn's own help page on invitation restrictions describes the triggers qualitatively and attaches no number: an account may be restricted when it has "sent many invitations within a short amount of time" or when many invitations are "ignored, left pending, or marked as spam", and the page states directly that "if you send an excessive number of invitations and we suspect the use of an automation tool, we may suspend or restrict your account".
- Yes: 300 and 800 invites a month: published by Waalaxy on its pricing page
- Yes: Five personalised connection notes a month on free accounts: published by LinkedIn
- Yes: Invitation restrictions typically last a week: published by LinkedIn
- Yes: Three-week wait before re-inviting a withdrawn contact: published by LinkedIn
- No: A weekly invitation cap of any specific size: published by LinkedIn
- No: What LinkedIn currently detects: published by anyone
The operating consequence is that a plan allowance is a budget, not a speed limit. Spending 800 invitations evenly across a month is about 26 a day, which is a rate many operators run comfortably. Spending the same 800 across the first week is a velocity spike, and velocity is one of the things LinkedIn's own page names as a trigger.
The acceptance-rate problem the allowance hides
The invite number gets the attention, and the metric that actually governs whether an account survives is acceptance rate.
LinkedIn's page states plainly that many invitations "ignored, left pending, or marked as spam by the recipients" is a restriction trigger. That makes acceptance rate a safety metric rather than a performance one, and it is a property of your list rather than of your tool. No vendor setting improves it.
Which reframes the upgrade decision. Moving from 300 to 800 invitations a month multiplies whatever your acceptance rate already is. If it is healthy, the extra volume compounds. If it is poor, the upgrade buys a faster route to a restriction, and the money would be better spent on a tighter list.
What LinkedIn's rules say about the tool itself
Waalaxy's LinkedIn actions run through a browser extension, which LinkedIn's documentation names specifically.
Its help page on prohibited software and extensions states that LinkedIn does not permit third-party software including "crawlers, bots, browser plug-ins, or browser extensions that scrape, modify the appearance of, or automate activity on LinkedIn's website", that any member using such tools "is in violation of the User Agreement", and that they risk having accounts "restricted or shut down" and the tools becoming non-functional.
The User Agreement, effective 3 November 2025, carries the underlying clauses: no software, scripts, robots, crawlers, plugins or add-ons used to scrape or copy the service, and no bots or other unauthorised automated methods used to add contacts or send messages.
That is the same position every vendor in this category operates under, and no amount of vendor safety language changes it. What differs is exposure per account, which is a function of how many accounts carry your pipeline and how hard each one works.
The email half, priced honestly
The Business tier's cold email sequences and 500 email finder credits are worth pricing as a separate product rather than as a feature.
500 credits does not survive a real list. More importantly, a sequencer does not supply the thing cold email actually needs, which is warmed sending infrastructure on domains configured for it. Sending cold email from your main domain through a tool bought for LinkedIn is the reliable way to damage a domain that was working fine.
If the plan is genuinely multichannel, the email side needs its own infrastructure decision made deliberately, and the LinkedIn tool's email module is a scheduling convenience on top of that rather than a substitute for it.
The two mechanics that break monthly-allowance planning
Two things published on LinkedIn's own help pages interact badly with an allowance-based plan, and neither appears in any vendor's onboarding.
The first is the withdrawal lockout. After withdrawing an invitation you cannot re-invite that person for up to three weeks. Withdrawing unaccepted invitations is standard advice in this category, presented as keeping the pending queue clean, and it quietly removes each of those contacts from your addressable list for most of a month. On a tight ICP where the same few hundred people are the whole market, that matters much more than the allowance does.
The second is that withdrawing does not help once you are already restricted. LinkedIn's page states directly that withdrawing pending invitations will not remove a restriction, that you cannot buy or acquire more invitations while restricted, that most restrictions clear within a week, and that support can neither shorten the wait nor tell you which type of restriction you have. There is no lever to pull once it lands.
Together those turn a monthly allowance into something less flexible than it looks. The allowance resets on a billing cycle; the platform's tolerance does not reset on anything you control. Planning a month around 800 invitations assumes 800 invitations will be permitted, and the only way to find out is to send them.
The safer construction is to treat the plan allowance as a ceiling you do not expect to reach, set a daily rate well inside it, and add volume by adding warmed accounts rather than by pushing one account harder. That is more expensive per invitation on a per-seat product, and it is the trade that keeps accounts alive.
Who it suits
A solo seller or a small team running LinkedIn at modest volume, wanting something cheaper and simpler than the cloud platforms, and comfortable with a browser-resident tool. At €19 a month the Pro tier is a genuinely low-cost entry.
It suits agencies poorly, for the usual reason: per-seat pricing against a channel whose safe operating model is many accounts each doing less, a trade set out in LinkedIn prospecting. The multi-sender shape is described in our HeyReach review, and the category-wide architecture comparison sits in LinkedIn automation tools.
What to settle before buying
Confirm the currency and the billing state you are actually being quoted, since the page carries monthly, quarterly and yearly states and served euros to our fetch.
Decide whether you need the invitation volume or the email channel, because those are the two separate upgrades and the second one adds no invitations.
Plan the daily rate rather than the monthly allowance, because the allowance is a budget and the restriction triggers LinkedIn publishes are about velocity and acceptance rather than totals.
And fix the list before buying more volume. Acceptance rate is the metric that decides whether an account survives, and it is the one thing no plan tier improves. If you would rather not own that risk, get a free campaign plan and we will map the channel to your ICP before anything sends.
Pricing and features verified as of August 2026. Verify current terms with the vendor before relying on them.
Frequently asked questions.
Frequently asked questions- How much does Waalaxy cost?
- Its pricing page served EUR 19, 49 and 69 per user a month to our fetch on 16 August 2026, for the Pro, Advanced and Business tiers, alongside quarterly and yearly billing states at 20 and 50 percent off. Currency on pricing pages in this category can be localised, so confirm what you are quoted.
- Can I really send 800 invitations a month?
- That is what the plan permits, not what the platform guarantees. LinkedIn publishes no weekly or monthly invitation ceiling and describes its triggers qualitatively, including many invitations sent in a short time. Treat the allowance as a budget spread evenly across working days rather than as a rate you can burst.
- Which tier should I choose?
- Pro to Advanced buys 500 more invitations a month plus API access, which is a volume decision. Advanced to Business buys no additional invitations at all, only the cold email channel and 500 finder credits, which is a channel decision. Make the two for different reasons.
- What actually decides whether my account survives?
- Acceptance rate, which is a property of your list rather than of your tool. LinkedIn names invitations ignored, left pending or marked as spam as a restriction trigger, which makes acceptance a safety metric. Upgrading tiers multiplies whatever your current acceptance rate is, in both directions.
About the author.
B2B cold email experts helping companies generate qualified leads through done-for-you outreach campaigns.
RevenueFlow Team
Explore more.
Ready to scale your outreach?
We build GTM engines that book real meetings. See the receipts.
Related articles.
Zopto Now Redirects to Zeekeo: What the 301 Means for Buyers
zopto.com returns an HTTP 301 to Zeekeo and serves a page that never says Zopto. The redirect chain, what the destination publishes, and what to re-price.
Expandi: The Bypass Feature and What LinkedIn's Terms Say
Expandi's pricing page advertises campaign types that allow bypassing outreach limits. LinkedIn's User Agreement names bypassing use limits as prohibited.
Dripify Alternatives: The Per-Seat Problem and What Fixes It
Most people leaving Dripify are unhappy with the arithmetic rather than the software. That diagnosis decides which alternatives are actually alternatives.
Octopus CRM: The Cheapest Way Into LinkedIn Automation
Octopus CRM has no pricing page: the prices sit in a homepage anchor, and they start at $6.99. A browser extension sold at extension prices, examined.
Expandi Pricing: One Published Tier and What Scales It
Expandi publishes one self-serve price, $99 a month per seat. The question is what happens to that figure once accounts, add-ons and ramping are counted.
Linked Helper: The Desktop Architecture Nobody Describes Right
Most write-ups file Linked Helper under browser extensions. It is a desktop application with its own embedded browser, and its pricing reflects that.