Regie.ai Pricing: Two Plans, Two Seat Minimums, and What They Buy

Regie.ai publishes two per-seat prices and, next to each one, a seat minimum. The lower plan is $180 per user per month on an annual contract with a ten-seat minimum. The higher plan is $499 per user per month on an annual contract with a five-seat minimum. Fetched from the vendor's own pricing page on 15 August 2026.

Multiply either pair and you get the number that actually matters, which the page does not print: $1,800 a month for the cheaper plan and $2,495 a month for the more expensive one. The plan that costs nearly three times as much per seat has a lower entry price than the plan that does not, and that inversion tells you what the company thinks it is selling.

A disclosure before going further. RevenueFlow runs cold outbound as a service and is paid on attended qualified meetings, so we compete for budget with tools like this one, though not in the same shape. Everything below comes from Regie.ai's own pages as they rendered on 15 August 2026.

The two plans

The pricing page frames the choice as two ways to power a prospecting team rather than as a good, better, best ladder.

AI SEP$180 per user per month, annual, 10-seat minimum

• Static and dynamic sequencing agents
• Prompt-based steps and bring your own list
• First and third party intent prioritisation
• Power dialer plus a shared sales floor
• AI messaging, call coaching and voicemails
• Our arithmetic: a floor of $1,800 a month

Force Multiplier Rep$499 per user per month, annual, 5-seat minimum

• Everything in AI SEP
• 120,000 AI and enrichment credits, stated as 1,000 accounts and 4,000 contacts
• Custom enrichment waterfalls plus bounce and job verification
• Parallel dialer with up to nine lines
• 10 mailboxes and domains with warming
• Our arithmetic: a floor of $2,495 a month

EnterpriseQuote only

• Everything in Force Multiplier Rep
• Custom AI and data credit packages
• Flexible seat bundles across SDRs and AEs
• Dedicated IP and domain strategy with inbox warming programmes
• Dedicated customer success and onboarding
• No figure published

The lower plan is a sales engagement platform: sequencing, a dialer, messaging assistance, coaching. The higher plan adds the layers that a team would otherwise buy separately, which is where the price difference lives. Data and enrichment credits, an enrichment waterfall with verification, a parallel dialer, and sending infrastructure in the form of ten mailboxes with domains and warming.

Read that way, the ten-seat minimum on the cheaper plan is not an obstacle. It is the segmentation. An engagement platform is priced and built for a team of reps, so the vendor is stating that below ten reps it does not want the conversation. The five-seat minimum on the expensive plan says the opposite: a smaller team can buy it, because what they are buying is capability rather than seats.

The add-ons, and the one that is worth pausing on

Three add-ons are published with rates, which is more transparency than this category usually offers.

Data packages come in four named tiers with credit counts attached: 525,000 credits described as 5,000 accounts and 20,000 contacts, 1,190,000 credits as 10,000 accounts and 50,000 contacts, 2,640,000 credits as 20,000 accounts and 120,000 contacts, and 6,080,000 credits as 40,000 accounts and 300,000 contacts. No prices are attached to those four, so the credit counts are the comparable unit rather than the cost.

A parallel dialer is listed at $1,800 per user per year, covering up to nine lines with the sales floor and AI voicemails included.

And mailbox rotation is listed at $50 per user per month for five mailboxes or $100 per user per month for ten, including domains and two months of warming.

That last one is the line worth stopping on, because it is priced per user and mailboxes are not a per-user resource.

Why per-user mailbox pricing is the wrong shape for sending

Cold outbound at volume has an unusual signature: it needs many mailboxes and very few humans. That is arithmetic rather than preference. Provider ceilings decide it, and the full set of them is in email sending limits by provider. Volume comes from mailbox count and careful pacing, so the mailbox is the unit that scales with the programme and the human is not.

Pricing mailboxes per user ties the two together. Ten mailboxes at $100 per user per month across a ten-seat contract is $1,000 a month, and the mailbox allowance rises only if you add people. A team that wants to double sending volume without doubling headcount cannot buy that on this line item, and a team that adds a rep who will never touch a cold campaign pays for ten more mailboxes anyway.

Reading a pricing page for its unit

• ~Depends: The price is per seat and the resources scale with seats
• ✓Yes: Sending mailboxes are counted per contract rather than per user
• ✓Yes: Data is metered in credits with the account and contact counts stated
• ✓Yes: Seat minimums are published rather than discovered on the call
• ✕No: Mailbox allowance rises only when you add people who will not send
• ✕No: Assuming an unpriced add-on tier is included in the headline rate

None of this makes the product wrong. It makes it clear who it is for. A team of ten reps each working their own named mailbox at modest daily volume is exactly the shape a per-seat platform is designed around, and for that team every line on this pricing page is coherent. The mismatch appears only when the motion is a sending programme, which is the boundary worked through in sales engagement platforms.

Where Regie sits in the category

The category term hides three different product shapes. Autonomous agents run the whole chain and you supervise. Copilots sit inside the workflow of human reps and a person keeps the decision. Managed hybrids run autonomously on paper and arrive in practice with a human on the account. That taxonomy, and the honest capability line underneath it, is in AI SDR.

Regie's published shape sits closer to the copilot end and then extends toward autonomy on the higher plan. The lower plan describes sequencing agents and prompt-based steps inside a rep's workflow. The higher plan describes research agents, reasons to engage, and enrichment waterfalls, which is a system doing more of the upstream work before a person sees it. The distinction that matters at purchase is not which label the vendor uses but where the human checkpoint sits and whether you can move it, which is the test set out in AI sales agents.

The dialer is the other thing that locates this product. A parallel dialer with up to nine lines, a shared sales floor with listen-in and whisper coaching, call transcription and AI voicemails is a serious telephony investment, and telephony is expensive to build and impossible to bolt on later. A vendor that has built it is aiming at phone-led teams. If nobody on your team will be making calls, a large share of what you would be paying for goes unused, and the per-minute economics of the machine-driven alternative are in AI cold calling.

What to establish before signing

Two things on this pricing page resolve only in a contract.

The credit model is the first. Credits are quoted in the millions and then translated into accounts and contacts, and the translation is where the real rate lives. Ask what a single email costs in credits, what a phone number costs, what an enrichment attempt costs when it fails to find anything, and whether unused credits carry into the next period. A credit price is not a price until those four are answered.

The seat minimum at renewal is the second. A ten-seat minimum on a first contract is a stated policy. Whether it still applies if your team shrinks, and what happens to the rate if you drop below it mid-term, is a question worth having answered in writing before the first term rather than during the second. The related question is whether the two plans can be mixed on one contract, since the enterprise tier advertises flexible seat bundles across SDRs and AEs and the two published plans do not say either way.

One doctrine note, since sequencing agents are the headline capability. We run one message per campaign for cold outbound, with no thread replies and no bumps, because every step after the first is delivered only to people who saw the previous message and chose not to answer, and the reputation cost of reaching that population lands on the sending domain across everything else it sends. What replaces the follow-up is a new campaign with a genuinely different premise. The full argument, including what the position costs us, is in email sequence software. Any sequencing product will let you run it either way; the default is what happens unless somebody decides otherwise.

The short version

Regie.ai publishes $180 per user per month with a ten-seat minimum for its engagement platform, and $499 per user per month with a five-seat minimum for the plan that adds data credits, enrichment waterfalls, a parallel dialer and ten warmed mailboxes. Our arithmetic on those pairs puts the monthly floors at $1,800 and $2,495 respectively, which inverts the apparent order of the two plans.

Add-ons are published with rates for the parallel dialer and mailbox rotation, and with credit counts but no prices for the four data packages. Mailbox rotation is priced per user, which ties sending capacity to headcount and is the wrong shape for a programme whose volume comes from mailbox count.

The product is coherent for a team of reps working their own mailboxes with a phone motion, and the seat minimums say plainly that this is who it is for. Before signing, settle the credit unit economics and what the seat minimum does at renewal.

If your motion is cold sending at volume rather than a rep team, the per-seat unit is charging you for the resource you have least of. You can see what a campaign would look like for your market instead.

Pricing and features verified against Regie.ai's own pricing page as of August 2026. Verify current terms with the vendor before relying on them.

Sources: Regie.ai pricing